Difference between revisions of "2006-07-30 GEOSS User V - AQ Data Systems"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
===AQ IT Support for End Users, Programs, Agencies and Projects=== | ===AQ IT Support for End Users, Programs, Agencies and Projects=== | ||
− | ====End Users: AQ Managment, Science & Policy, Informing Public & Education==== | + | ====..End Users: AQ Managment, Science & Policy, Informing Public & Education==== |
− | ====Programs: GEOSS,==== | + | ====..Programs: GEOSS,==== |
− | ====Agencies: National, International==== | + | ====..Agencies: National, International==== |
− | ====Projects: ????==== | + | ====..Projects: ????==== |
===[[Prototype Agile AQ Application Examples]]=== | ===[[Prototype Agile AQ Application Examples]]=== |
Revision as of 08:57, June 23, 2006
.
Current and Near Future AQ Information System of Systems
..Current Situation
- Few users; limited, sporadic data/model; poor integration; Dedicated 'Stove Pipe' Systems -> Stiff and limited decision support
..Near Furure
- Diverse users, More sensory/model data-GEOSS; Extensive integration and 'mashing'-Web 2.0; Network effect ->Responsive decisin support
..Paper purpose and outline
- Community assessment of AQ IT; User feedback to GEOSS Architecture; Aid to agency planners
AQ Data System Architectures
..User-Driven: User Drives Design
..Distributed: Structure Extends over Many Dimensions
..Loosely Couppled: Software Components, System of Systems, Architcture of Participation
Information Technologies
..Software Components: Data as Service, Web Services
..Interoperability Technologies: Standards/Conventions, Wrappers and Adopters, Workflow Engines
..Web 2.0 Technologies: Searching, Tagging, RSS, AJAX ...
Challenges
..Human Factors
- The 4 C's: Communication, Coordination, Cooperation, Competion, Coopetition
- Attracting user participation
..Architecture
- Maximize the 'Network Effect'....
..Technologies
- Grasping and harnessing Web 2.0