Difference between revisions of "FAIR Dataset Quality Information"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 51: Line 51:
  
 
<big>'''Portfolio Management and Repository Certifications ''' </big><br>  
 
<big>'''Portfolio Management and Repository Certifications ''' </big><br>  
* NGDA Data Lifecycle Maturity Model (LMM) ([https://communities.geoplatform.gov/ngda-portfolio/2015-lifecycle-maturity-assessment/ NGDA 2015]; [http://commons.esipfed.org/sites/default/files/2014_FGDC_BaselineAssessment_AGUPoster_PeltzLewisBlakeColemanJohnstonDeLoatch.pdf  
+
* NGDA Data Lifecycle Maturity Model (LMM) [https://communities.geoplatform.gov/ngda-portfolio/2015-lifecycle-maturity-assessment/ (NGDA 2015]; [http://commons.esipfed.org/sites/default/files/2014_FGDC_BaselineAssessment_AGUPoster_PeltzLewisBlakeColemanJohnstonDeLoatch.pdf Peltz-Lewis et al. 2014)] <br>
Peltz-Lewis et al. 2014)] <br>
 
 
* WDS-DSA-RDA core trustworthy data repository requirements [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.168411 (Edmunds et al. 2016; updated 2019)]<br>
 
* WDS-DSA-RDA core trustworthy data repository requirements [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.168411 (Edmunds et al. 2016; updated 2019)]<br>
 
* USGS Trusted Data Repository Checklist (Faundeen, Kirk & Brown 2017)<br> <br>
 
* USGS Trusted Data Repository Checklist (Faundeen, Kirk & Brown 2017)<br> <br>

Revision as of 07:59, June 6, 2020

Document

This is the document for community guidelines of consistently curating and representing dataset quality information, in line with the FAIR principles.

Overview

This document provides resources for developing community guidelines for consistently curating and representing dataset quality information and captures the outcomes. The guidelines aims to help curate dataset quality information that is findable and accessible, machine- and human-readable, interoperable, and reusable.

Resources

Multi-dimensions of Data and Information Quality:

Existing Fitness for Purpose Assessment approaches Through the Full Life Cycle of Earth Science Datasets:

  • Scientific quality:
    • NASA Technical Readiness Levels for Operations (Mankins 2009)
    • NOAA STAR data product algorithm maturity matrix (Zhou, Divakarla & Liu 2016)
    • Perspectives of data uncertainty (Moroni et al. 2019)
    • OGC UncertML (Williams et al. 2009)
    • Operational Readiness Levels For Disaster Operations (ESIP Disasters Cluster 2018)

Dataset-level metadata quality:

Portfolio Management and Repository Certifications

FAIR Data Principles

Organizational Challenges & Approaches

Data Quality Management Framework

---

Return to Pre-ESIP Workshop: About
Return to Information Quality Cluster Homepage