Difference between revisions of "Sustainable Data Management/20200214 telcon notes"
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
Margaret | Margaret | ||
write a few sentences for Megan about the ROI paper. | write a few sentences for Megan about the ROI paper. | ||
− | + | * groups that participated | |
− | + | * output of the sustainable DM cluster | |
− | + | * convening aspect of ESIP, why appropriate that ESIP hosts this stuff | |
TBD: Maybe a blog post later | TBD: Maybe a blog post later |
Revision as of 15:16, February 14, 2020
To connect
- Join from computer, tablet or smartphone at: https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/618011013
- Dial in using your phone: :United States: +1 (571) 317-3122
- Access Code: 618-011-013
Agenda
- Where do we go next?
Background
Our original raison d'etre
This group formed in late 2015 to investigate pathways for sustainable, increased collaboration and coordination among repositories engaged in environmental data management that will benefit both research networks and individual investigators. The group has three major activities: Developing a framework for describing Return on Investment (ROI) in data repositories; describing the landscape of data services offered by repositories, to identify gaps; and defining a Common Technical Vision to sustain data, rather than the repositories themselves.
Link to notes from the Tempe meeting: http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Notes_from_Collaborative_Strategies_for_Sustained_Environmental_Data_Management_workshop_(Tempe,_AZ_Nov_2015)
Accomplishments
In the major areas above:
Framework for describing Return on Investment (ROI) in data repositories;
- Held a workshop in Tempe: Return on Investment for Environmental Data Repositories
- Paper: Parr, C., C. Gries, M. O'Brien, R. R. Downs, R. Duerr, R. Koskela, P. Tarrant, K. E. Maull, N. Hoebelheinrich, S. Stall. 2019. A Discussion of Value Metrics for Data Repositories in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Data Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-058
Describing the landscape of data services offered by repositories, to identify gaps;
This topic is being covered by RE3data (https://www.re3data.org/). Our involvement with them has been intended to further this objective
Define a Common Technical Vision to sustain data, rather than the repositories themselves.
- Held a followup workshop in Santa Barbara: Developing a Common Technical Vision for Repository Interoperability
- Notes:
- Paper: Gries C, A. Budden, C. Laney, M. O'Brien, M. Servilla, W. Sheldon, K. Vanderbilt, D. Vieglas. 2018. Facilitating and Improving Environmental Research Data Repository Interoperability. Data Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2018-022
- Held a followup workshop in Santa Barbara: Developing a Common Technical Vision for Repository Interoperability
Attending
- Philip Tarrant
- John Porter
- Bob Downs
- Margaret O'Brien
- Megan Carter
Regrets
Corinna
Notes
Action items
Margaret write a few sentences for Megan about the ROI paper.
- groups that participated
- output of the sustainable DM cluster
- convening aspect of ESIP, why appropriate that ESIP hosts this stuff
TBD: Maybe a blog post later