Difference between revisions of "Sustainable Data Management/20160311 telecon notes"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(Created page with "ESIP Sustainable Data Management cluster 11 March 2016, 4 pm EST Participants present: 13 :Margaret O’Brien :Corinna Gries :Philip Tarrant :Anne Wilson :Abigail Benson :Dav...") |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:Matthew Jones | :Matthew Jones | ||
:Ann Chiu | :Ann Chiu | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Agenda== | ||
| + | :Tempe workshop (Nov 2015) highlights (Focus groups) | ||
| + | :ESIP summer meeting planning | ||
| + | :Future workshop planning | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Overview from Tempe== | ||
| + | Landscape and Gap Analysis | ||
| + | :Goal: an analysis of existing repos | ||
| + | :Outcomes: Survey of current capabilities, Analysis of re3data, COPDESS, –users understand which repositories match their needs | ||
| + | |||
| + | Common Technical Vision | ||
| + | :Goal: Interoperable data, better adherence to standards | ||
| + | :Outcomes: Defined common service endpoints, Best practices for data packaging, Best practices for developers applying standards (e.g., PROV) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Return on Investment | ||
| + | :Goal: Show value of data center relative to its cost, [JIST report link here] | ||
| + | :Outcomes: Common vocabulary and metrics, Reports to stakeholders, Assist users with repository choices | ||
Revision as of 18:27, March 11, 2016
ESIP Sustainable Data Management cluster 11 March 2016, 4 pm EST
Participants present: 13
- Margaret O’Brien
- Corinna Gries
- Philip Tarrant
- Anne Wilson
- Abigail Benson
- Dave Rugg
- Cynthia Parr
- Dave Vieglais
- Erin Robinson
- Ruth Duerr
- Sherry Lake
- Matthew Jones
- Ann Chiu
Agenda
- Tempe workshop (Nov 2015) highlights (Focus groups)
- ESIP summer meeting planning
- Future workshop planning
Overview from Tempe
Landscape and Gap Analysis
- Goal: an analysis of existing repos
- Outcomes: Survey of current capabilities, Analysis of re3data, COPDESS, –users understand which repositories match their needs
Common Technical Vision
- Goal: Interoperable data, better adherence to standards
- Outcomes: Defined common service endpoints, Best practices for data packaging, Best practices for developers applying standards (e.g., PROV)
Return on Investment
- Goal: Show value of data center relative to its cost, [JIST report link here]
- Outcomes: Common vocabulary and metrics, Reports to stakeholders, Assist users with repository choices
