Difference between revisions of "110915 DataManagementNotes"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(Created page with "Participants: Ruth Duerr, Ron Weaver, Bob Downs, Matt Mayernik, Jeff Arnfield, Erin Robinson * Review action items ** Ruth - breadcrumbs on the module. Name on each slide in upp...")
 
Line 9: Line 9:
 
** AGU status?  
 
** AGU status?  
 
* Modules status
 
* Modules status
** Action: Erin Follow-up on identifier issue.  
+
** New Action: Erin email group when clarify identifier issue.  
 
* Review author's guide
 
* Review author's guide
 
** Ruth created the author's guide  
 
** Ruth created the author's guide  
 
*** 10 slides - does it include shell or content? ~ 7 body pages per module
 
*** 10 slides - does it include shell or content? ~ 7 body pages per module
 
+
*** don't want module titles and what's on the wiki to to diverge
 +
*** In general reference - add style guide for references - AGU/AMS style guide
 +
**** New Action: Matt Mayernik is looking into options
 
* Discuss module review process
 
* Discuss module review process
* Schedule
+
** Review Criteria:
 +
*** Add to author's guide what review process
 +
*** Want to make sure the content is balanced, concise and complete
 +
*** Conforms to author's guide
 +
*** Reasonable ref check
 +
*** Understandability/Simplicity - to non-expert (right level of details)
 +
**** Undergraduate level or general college level
 +
**** reasonably simple for non expert to understand
 +
*** ACTION: Ruth will add what review criteria will be
 +
** Review Process:
 +
*** review board
 +
*** Blind peer-review
 +
*** Blind review within the board
 +
*** Bob Downs volunteered to help review. 
 +
*** Each module reviewed by one other person and need a way to track that. 
 +
*** Reviewers can make changes; evolve as we go w/ questions.
 +
*** When modules are nearly set - running them by NOAA for review.
 +
**** NESDIS Headquarters -EDMC (Jeff DLB/Lewis)
 +
* Schedule - October 15 for draft
 +
* Stipend/Honorarium - $100 If we think we need someone to edit/vet these may be good to pay.
 +
** Could UIUC students review? Action: Ruth will follow-up on this topic.
 +
** Carol - Action for Glossary.

Revision as of 10:54, September 15, 2011

Participants: Ruth Duerr, Ron Weaver, Bob Downs, Matt Mayernik, Jeff Arnfield, Erin Robinson

  • Review action items
    • Ruth - breadcrumbs on the module. Name on each slide in upper left corner is sufficient.
    • Erin - Created email for questions related to short course
    • New actions - Ruth add email and version to template
    • Ruth - Drafted author guidelines.
  • Workshop update? - Ruth needs to follow-up. Early career scienctist workshop seems to be a go.
    • AGU status?
  • Modules status
    • New Action: Erin email group when clarify identifier issue.
  • Review author's guide
    • Ruth created the author's guide
      • 10 slides - does it include shell or content? ~ 7 body pages per module
      • don't want module titles and what's on the wiki to to diverge
      • In general reference - add style guide for references - AGU/AMS style guide
        • New Action: Matt Mayernik is looking into options
  • Discuss module review process
    • Review Criteria:
      • Add to author's guide what review process
      • Want to make sure the content is balanced, concise and complete
      • Conforms to author's guide
      • Reasonable ref check
      • Understandability/Simplicity - to non-expert (right level of details)
        • Undergraduate level or general college level
        • reasonably simple for non expert to understand
      • ACTION: Ruth will add what review criteria will be
    • Review Process:
      • review board
      • Blind peer-review
      • Blind review within the board
      • Bob Downs volunteered to help review.
      • Each module reviewed by one other person and need a way to track that.
      • Reviewers can make changes; evolve as we go w/ questions.
      • When modules are nearly set - running them by NOAA for review.
        • NESDIS Headquarters -EDMC (Jeff DLB/Lewis)
  • Schedule - October 15 for draft
  • Stipend/Honorarium - $100 If we think we need someone to edit/vet these may be good to pay.
    • Could UIUC students review? Action: Ruth will follow-up on this topic.
    • Carol - Action for Glossary.