Difference between revisions of "UsabilityCluster/MonthlyMeeting/2017-05-03 MeetingNotes"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Sophisticus (talk | contribs) |
Sophisticus (talk | contribs) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* Motivation | * Motivation | ||
:* Reasons/Interests in the system-under-test | :* Reasons/Interests in the system-under-test | ||
− | + | * Expectation with the system-under-test | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | * Sample Questions to Consider for this section: | |
+ | :* Recommended - | ||
+ | ::* What is your field of study? (fill in the blank) (Possibly include link to RDA vocabulary for the suggested values) | ||
Examples for presenting the above questions with predefined values: | Examples for presenting the above questions with predefined values: | ||
Line 28: | Line 30: | ||
☐ application development | ☐ application development | ||
Other, please specify here: | Other, please specify here: | ||
− | + | ::* How often do you [use a system that is presented by the system-under-test]? | |
− | :::::* How would you rate your experience level with [the system that is presented by the system-under-test]? | + | :::* 1 to 5 (Likert scale) 1 being least 5 being most |
− | + | ::* How would you rate your experience level with [the system that is presented by the system-under-test]? | |
− | + | :::* 1 to 5 (Likert scale) 1 being least 5 being most | |
− | :::::* How would you rate your experience level with [the function/task]? | + | ::* How often do you [perform the function/task that is being tested]? |
− | + | :::* 1 to 5 (Likert scale) 1 being least 5 being most | |
− | + | ::* How would you rate your experience level with [the function/task]? | |
− | + | :::* 1 to 5 (Likert scale) 1 being least 5 being most | |
− | + | :* Optional - | |
− | + | ::* What are your key job duties? | |
+ | ::* Why are you interested in participating in this test? | ||
+ | ::* Is there anything you would like to learn from the experience? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''3. Coordinate with RMap team regarding ESIP Summer Meeting sessions''' | ||
+ | * User studies with existing RMap features. | ||
+ | * Dedicated breakout session to introduce RMap and provide usability evaluation for upcoming features. | ||
+ | :* Earlier session will be better so users can attend before doing the usability test | ||
+ | :* Put the poster near the station where they are testing. We can ask Bruce about this. | ||
+ | :* Sophie will confirm 1-on-1 area with Bruce | ||
+ | * Shooting for ~12 users for the study (3 people per day: morning break, lunch, afternoon break, ‘unconference’), Post on Slack | ||
+ | :* Tweet | ||
+ | :* Include RMap handout | ||
+ | :* Doodle poll: Create Doodle poll with open slots and let people sign up for slots when they are available? Send out link to ESIP All and ESIP data stewardship | ||
+ | * For June: the goal is to have preliminary content for the framework up to the “usability test itself” section, and the team will aim to rehearse the initial tasks with the mockups. |
Latest revision as of 09:42, May 31, 2017
Attendees: Reid Boehm, Karen Hanson, Rachel Volentine, Shannon Rauch, Madison Langseth, Tamar Norkin, Sophie Hou
1. Review Usability Test Framework progress thus far
2. Continue developing the “Pre-Test Survey” section of the Framework
- Demographic information
- Domain/Area of Study
- Experience with the system-under-test
- Motivation
- Reasons/Interests in the system-under-test
- Expectation with the system-under-test
- Sample Questions to Consider for this section:
- Recommended -
- What is your field of study? (fill in the blank) (Possibly include link to RDA vocabulary for the suggested values)
Examples for presenting the above questions with predefined values:
☐ research ☐ program management/project management ☐ data management ☐ metadata creating ☐ database administration ☐ ecological modeling ☐ policy making ☐ field work ☐ application development Other, please specify here:
- How often do you [use a system that is presented by the system-under-test]?
- 1 to 5 (Likert scale) 1 being least 5 being most
- How would you rate your experience level with [the system that is presented by the system-under-test]?
- 1 to 5 (Likert scale) 1 being least 5 being most
- How often do you [perform the function/task that is being tested]?
- 1 to 5 (Likert scale) 1 being least 5 being most
- How would you rate your experience level with [the function/task]?
- 1 to 5 (Likert scale) 1 being least 5 being most
- Optional -
- What are your key job duties?
- Why are you interested in participating in this test?
- Is there anything you would like to learn from the experience?
3. Coordinate with RMap team regarding ESIP Summer Meeting sessions
- User studies with existing RMap features.
- Dedicated breakout session to introduce RMap and provide usability evaluation for upcoming features.
- Earlier session will be better so users can attend before doing the usability test
- Put the poster near the station where they are testing. We can ask Bruce about this.
- Sophie will confirm 1-on-1 area with Bruce
- Shooting for ~12 users for the study (3 people per day: morning break, lunch, afternoon break, ‘unconference’), Post on Slack
- Tweet
- Include RMap handout
- Doodle poll: Create Doodle poll with open slots and let people sign up for slots when they are available? Send out link to ESIP All and ESIP data stewardship
- For June: the goal is to have preliminary content for the framework up to the “usability test itself” section, and the team will aim to rehearse the initial tasks with the mockups.