Difference between revisions of "110915 DataManagementNotes"

Revision as of 10:54, September 15, 2011

Participants: Ruth Duerr, Ron Weaver, Bob Downs, Matt Mayernik, Jeff Arnfield, Erin Robinson

Review action items
- Ruth - breadcrumbs on the module. Name on each slide in upper left corner is sufficient.
- Erin - Created email for questions related to short course
- New actions - Ruth add email and version to template
- Ruth - Drafted author guidelines.
Workshop update? - Ruth needs to follow-up. Early career scienctist workshop seems to be a go.
- AGU status?
Modules status
- New Action: Erin email group when clarify identifier issue.
Review author's guide
- Ruth created the author's guide
  - 10 slides - does it include shell or content? ~ 7 body pages per module
  - don't want module titles and what's on the wiki to to diverge
  - In general reference - add style guide for references - AGU/AMS style guide
    - New Action: Matt Mayernik is looking into options
Discuss module review process
- Review Criteria:
  - Add to author's guide what review process
  - Want to make sure the content is balanced, concise and complete
  - Conforms to author's guide
  - Reasonable ref check
  - Understandability/Simplicity - to non-expert (right level of details)
    - Undergraduate level or general college level
    - reasonably simple for non expert to understand
  - ACTION: Ruth will add what review criteria will be
- Review Process:
  - review board
  - Blind peer-review
  - Blind review within the board
  - Bob Downs volunteered to help review.
  - Each module reviewed by one other person and need a way to track that.
  - Reviewers can make changes; evolve as we go w/ questions.
  - When modules are nearly set - running them by NOAA for review.
    - NESDIS Headquarters -EDMC (Jeff DLB/Lewis)
Schedule - October 15 for draft
Stipend/Honorarium - $100 If we think we need someone to edit/vet these may be good to pay.
- Could UIUC students review? Action: Ruth will follow-up on this topic.
- Carol - Action for Glossary.

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 ** AGU status?
 * Modules status
-** Action: Erin Follow-up on identifier issue.
+** New Action: Erin email group when clarify identifier issue.
 * Review author's guide
 ** Ruth created the author's guide
 *** 10 slides - does it include shell or content? ~ 7 body pages per module
+*** don't want module titles and what's on the wiki to to diverge
+*** In general reference - add style guide for references - AGU/AMS style guide
+**** New Action: Matt Mayernik is looking into options
 * Discuss module review process
-* Schedule
+** Review Criteria:
+*** Add to author's guide what review process
+*** Want to make sure the content is balanced, concise and complete
+*** Conforms to author's guide
+*** Reasonable ref check
+*** Understandability/Simplicity - to non-expert (right level of details)
+**** Undergraduate level or general college level
+**** reasonably simple for non expert to understand
+*** ACTION: Ruth will add what review criteria will be
+** Review Process:
+*** review board
+*** Blind peer-review
+*** Blind review within the board
+*** Bob Downs volunteered to help review.
+*** Each module reviewed by one other person and need a way to track that.
+*** Reviewers can make changes; evolve as we go w/ questions.
+*** When modules are nearly set - running them by NOAA for review.
+**** NESDIS Headquarters -EDMC (Jeff DLB/Lewis)
+* Schedule - October 15 for draft
+* Stipend/Honorarium - $100 If we think we need someone to edit/vet these may be good to pay.
+** Could UIUC students review? Action: Ruth will follow-up on this topic.
+** Carol - Action for Glossary.