Difference between revisions of "GEO AQ AIP-III Scenario"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(New page: The brief description for Dec 22 should include * a high-level overview of the (user-driven) scenario (how if any it relates to or builds on the AIP-2 scenario & results), * an identifi...) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | [[GEO AQ CoP|< GEO AQ CoP]] | ||
| + | |||
The brief description for Dec 22 should include | The brief description for Dec 22 should include | ||
| Line 5: | Line 7: | ||
* the objectives of the decision support/making process in question, | * the objectives of the decision support/making process in question, | ||
* links/references to related GEO tasks or other initiatives. | * links/references to related GEO tasks or other initiatives. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The final draft of the scenarios (due in January) will follow the structure used in AIP-2 for the scenarios. Keep in mind that the scenarios are high-level descriptions and should be user-driven, focusing on the decision-support/making process (and not on the components or specific resources to be used). | ||
Latest revision as of 12:32, December 14, 2009
The brief description for Dec 22 should include
- a high-level overview of the (user-driven) scenario (how if any it relates to or builds on the AIP-2 scenario & results),
- an identification of at least the end-user (identification of other actors to follow),
- the objectives of the decision support/making process in question,
- links/references to related GEO tasks or other initiatives.
The final draft of the scenarios (due in January) will follow the structure used in AIP-2 for the scenarios. Keep in mind that the scenarios are high-level descriptions and should be user-driven, focusing on the decision-support/making process (and not on the components or specific resources to be used).
