Session Notes

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Revision as of 11:59, July 17, 2008 by Pfox (talk | contribs) (New page: == ESIP as a virtual organization (VO) 10am-11am == * Peter Fox 1. Semantic add-on to ESIP MWiki- 2. Metric – ID contributors input/output and increase by x over t 3. Fix “watch” ...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

ESIP as a virtual organization (VO) 10am-11am

  • Peter Fox

1. Semantic add-on to ESIP MWiki-

2. Metric – ID contributors input/output and increase by x over t 3. Fix “watch” page


Deki (Japanese for smart) Wiki “media wiki” Sitemap Watch pages Rss Opt – in

Metric of how effect is it…use for

VIDEO CONFERENCE (Webex, skype) Limits Connectivity increase Small videos like skype rather than one large video Active chat (IRC, SKYPE CHAT), possible for archive, how fast can you type?

Protocol for chat? Webex – raise hand Genesis – ESIP Vyew Record video – very important events NOAA and NASA blocks skype, they need to think about it, and perhaps make it a requirement Gmail chat Webcast and archives (podcast) Viddler – comment on video Show – me – do?

Hierarchy of meetings Heterarchy of VO Interfacing via telecom → shorten time but increase what gets accomplished Get Organized before!!! Send out the presentation before hand so that people have had a chance to view/review it ahead of time and then the time during the telecom can be spend DISCUSSING. Same time Leader –focus on highly targeted → outcome Why gather? What we will do? Be aware of spin – up time to participate!

e.g. shuttle analogy (bus not space)
  1. of people in a session = 2?

Product out of every elemen Leader to delegate Agenda items and added on fly – by participates Schedule by preparedness, meeting are set up in time space instead of prepared space Why 1 hour? Unintended/accidental participation for some initiative, Do we need goals for this? Rss/Atom – email Notification? Working? Highlight from different perspective COP – community of practice ideas --- involves how to take advantage of this for ESIP : broadens perspective What tools? EPA e.g. computational toxicology Strategic planning is more structured, not the same as unintended

e.g. Sci COP (EPA) Ontology – driven organization Federation was set up based on “The Age of Unreason” Cluster can be a COP + formed anytime then transition into a standing committee e.g. AQ Cluster → GEOSS structure use wiki’s

MEASURE? Participation numbers Standards metrics did not work → nuggets Social capitol Capture Roles and Responsibility Pragmatism made known to leads What are drivers? Internal forces External GEOSS has same issue → uses “CALL for participation” (CESIP use this)

Rights and Obligations Delegation Leave a record Align with what is happening Expose what you are doing!!!