Difference between revisions of "Interagency Data Stewardship/LifeCycle/Jan2011Meeting"

Revision as of 21:29, December 7, 2010

ESIP 2011 Winter Meeting Plans

Agreed to Sessions

Citation guidelines and identifiers
- Short presentations on ID's paper and testbed - Ruth and Nancy
- Presentation on citations - Mark P.
- Walk through of FOO related examples - Curt
- Discussion and develop plan
Provenance
- Review of various provenance - related standards
  - OPM - Hook
  - OPMv - Hook
  - Provenir
  - ISO lineage
  - PML 2.1
  - WC Provenance vocabulary - Curt
- Review Earth science provenance/context requirements
- Discussion

Other Potential Sessions

Data quality and relation to value of data (Bruce)

Must do

Business meeting
- Cluster chairmanship
- Workplan for upcoming year

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == ESIP 2011 Winter Meeting Plans ==
-===Potential Topics ===
+=== Agreed to Sessions ===
+* Citation guidelines and identifiers
+** Short presentations on ID's paper and testbed - Ruth and Nancy
+** Presentation on citations - Mark P.
+** Walk through of FOO related examples - Curt
+** Discussion and develop plan
 * Provenance
-** Curt walk through of FOO examples to illustrate the issues
+** Review of various provenance - related standards
-** Paper session - invite ACCESS, etc. projects to discuss their projects and the issues they are running into
+*** OPM - Hook
-** Session reviewing the existing provenance standards, differences, similarities, gaps, etc.
+*** OPMv - Hook
-** Specific questions which might be tackled in these sessions, include:
+*** Provenir
-*** Which standards/models should be used?
+*** ISO lineage
-**** OPM
+*** PML 2.1
-**** OPMv
+*** WC Provenance vocabulary - Curt
-**** Provenir
+** Review Earth science provenance/context requirements
-**** ISO Lineage
+** Discussion
-**** PML 2.1
-**** W3C Provenance vocabulary
+=== Other Potential Sessions ===
-*** What testbed activities might help
-*** What to do about domain specific needs? E.g., vocabularies, etc.
-* Citation guidelines - start developing/reaffirming these
 * Data quality and relation to value of data (Bruce)
-* Identifiers - Identify the next set of identifier issues to work on. For example, in the first go around we've only considered data sets as a whole and individual items (granules) within a data set. What other things need identifiers?
 === Must do ===