Difference between revisions of "FAIR Dataset Quality Information"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 34: Line 34:
 
** NCEI/CICS-NC scientific data stewardship maturity matrix [https://datascience.codata.org/articles/abstract/10.2481/dsj.14-049/ Peng et al. 2015)];[https://datascience.codata.org/articles/10.5334/dsj-2019-041/ (Peng et al 2019b)]<br>
 
** NCEI/CICS-NC scientific data stewardship maturity matrix [https://datascience.codata.org/articles/abstract/10.2481/dsj.14-049/ Peng et al. 2015)];[https://datascience.codata.org/articles/10.5334/dsj-2019-041/ (Peng et al 2019b)]<br>
 
** CEOS WGISS data management and stewardship maturity matrix (WGISS DSIG 2017)<br>
 
** CEOS WGISS data management and stewardship maturity matrix (WGISS DSIG 2017)<br>
** WMO stewardship maturity matrix for climate data (SMM-CD Working Group 2019)<br>
+
** WMO stewardship maturity matrix for climate data [https://figshare.com/articles/The_WMO-Wide_Stewardship_Maturity_Matrix_for_Climate_Data/7006028 (SMM-CD Working Group 2019)]<br>
 
** GEOSS Data Management Principles and Data Sharing Principles [https://www.earthobservations.org/documents/dswg/201504_data_management_principles_long_final.pdf (GEO DMP TF 2015)]; [https://www.earthobservations.org/documents/dswg/10_GEOSS%20Data%20Sharing%20Principles%20post%202015.pdf (GEO DSWG 2014)] <br>
 
** GEOSS Data Management Principles and Data Sharing Principles [https://www.earthobservations.org/documents/dswg/201504_data_management_principles_long_final.pdf (GEO DMP TF 2015)]; [https://www.earthobservations.org/documents/dswg/10_GEOSS%20Data%20Sharing%20Principles%20post%202015.pdf (GEO DSWG 2014)] <br>
  

Revision as of 13:44, June 4, 2020

Document

This is the document for community guidelines of consistently curating and representing dataset quality information, in line with the FAIR principles.

Overview

This document provides resources for developing community guidelines for consistently curating and representing dataset quality information and captures the outcomes. The guidelines aims to help curate dataset quality information that is findable and accessible, machine- and human-readable, interoperable, and reusable.

Resources

Multi-dimensions of Data and Information Quality:

Existing Fitness for Purpose Assessment approaches Through the Full Life Cycle of Earth Science Datasets:

  • Scientific quality:
    • NASA Technical Readiness Levels for Operations (Mankins 2009)
    • NOAA STAR data product algorithm maturity matrix (Zhou, Divakarla & Liu 2016)
    • Perspectives of data uncertainty (Moroni et al. 2019)
    • OGC UncertML (Williams et al. 2009)
    • Operational Readiness Levels For Disaster Operations (ESIP Disasters Cluster 2018)
  • Service quality:
    • NSIDC level of services (Duerr et al. 2009)
    • NCEI tiered scientific data stewardship services (Peng et al. 2016)
    • GCOS ECV Data and Information Access Matrix (website)
    • Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS) framework (website)
    • NCEI/ESIP-DSC data use and services maturity matrix (Serv-MM Working Group 2018)
    • Data Impact (Downs 2019)

Dataset-level metadata quality:

  • Completeness: NCEI Collection-Level Metadata Rubric Tool
  • FAIR metadata checklist – NCEAS MetaDIG
  • Metadata checklist of LTER network data management system

Portfolio Management and Repository Certifications

  • NGDA Data Lifecycle Maturity Model (LMM)
  • WDS-DSA-RDA core trustworthy data repository requirements
  • USGS Trusted Data Repository Checklist

FAIR Data Principles

  • FAIR Data Principles
  • RDA FAIR Data Maturity Indicators

Organizational Challenges & Approaches

  • NASA’s ESDSWG Data Quality Working Group Recommendations
  • Gaps in Essential Climate Variables Assessment
  • FAIR and Data Management for a Multidisciplinary Research Center

Data Quality Management Framework

  • High Quality Global Data Management Framework for Climate Data (HQ-GDMFC)
  • Conceptual Enterprise Framework for Managing Scientific Data Stewardship


---

Return to Pre-ESIP Workshop: About
Return to Information Quality Cluster Homepage