Difference between revisions of "ESC 2013 01 28"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(Created page with "Participants: Sergio, Jeff, Angela, Diana Pennington (University of Tx), David LaZaks, Emily Law (JPL), and Erin Jeff McWhirter: Champion for Defining Above pilot study case ...") |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Sergio: Champion for Participate in the NASA ESDSWG activity to develop a Reference Architecture for the ESC | Sergio: Champion for Participate in the NASA ESDSWG activity to develop a Reference Architecture for the ESC | ||
| − | + | * We want to define the ecosystem as well as new technologies that need to be a part of it | |
| − | + | * Sergio the vision should guide the technology | |
| − | Jeff Whirter: | + | Jeff Whirter: |
| − | + | * before you can facilitate interactions, you need to know what they have to begin with and what they need | |
| − | + | * look at the data, then we can see how people make use of it | |
| − | + | * collaboration around data and digital items | |
Emily: | Emily: | ||
| − | + | * we want to understand what the data we are including whether it be datasets, software, tools, | |
| − | + | * what the scientists are users will be included in this data model/information model | |
| − | + | * The activities all address this in terms of the use cases and assessments | |
Collectively we need to work on the Shared Vision of ESC | Collectively we need to work on the Shared Vision of ESC | ||
Participate in the NASA ESDWG & ESC Reference Architecture | Participate in the NASA ESDWG & ESC Reference Architecture | ||
| − | + | * what is the difference in the terms of the deliverable | |
| − | + | * a difference between purely voluntary and semi voluntary | |
| − | + | * merged the two together | |
| − | + | * we’ve looked at a number of tools that are at least candidates | |
Jeff and Peter will be working together on Above | Jeff and Peter will be working together on Above | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Is the Science Definition Team Formed? | Is the Science Definition Team Formed? | ||
| − | + | * this is a good opportunity for moving on with this process | |
Might be useful just to present a light what the ESC is to bring people in, to see if we can get some of the people in to work on this together | Might be useful just to present a light what the ESC is to bring people in, to see if we can get some of the people in to work on this together | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
5 Year Plan | 5 Year Plan | ||
| − | + | * Continue to define vision | |
| − | + | * Put in reference architecture | |
| − | + | * Once we have reference architecture, continue surveying tools to fill in spots of architecture (implementation, but will have to be tweaks) | |
| − | + | * The vision will never completely stop | |
Siri Jodha: | Siri Jodha: | ||
| − | + | * will align current funded “collaboratoy” – related projects with ESC activities. And vice-versa | |
| − | + | * would change to “strategy” or “encourage” or “strategy” | |
Action Items | Action Items | ||
| − | Chris will add CEMAC items to wiki | + | * Chris will add CEMAC items to wiki |
| − | Champions should fill out chart | + | * Champions should fill out chart |
| − | For activities identify deliverables and outcomes we expect | + | * For activities identify deliverables and outcomes we expect |
| − | Send out individual emails to champions | + | * Send out individual emails to champions |
Latest revision as of 12:09, March 25, 2013
Participants: Sergio, Jeff, Angela, Diana Pennington (University of Tx), David LaZaks, Emily Law (JPL), and Erin
Jeff McWhirter: Champion for Defining Above pilot study case
Sergio: Champion for Participate in the NASA ESDSWG activity to develop a Reference Architecture for the ESC
- We want to define the ecosystem as well as new technologies that need to be a part of it
- Sergio the vision should guide the technology
Jeff Whirter:
- before you can facilitate interactions, you need to know what they have to begin with and what they need
- look at the data, then we can see how people make use of it
- collaboration around data and digital items
Emily:
- we want to understand what the data we are including whether it be datasets, software, tools,
- what the scientists are users will be included in this data model/information model
- The activities all address this in terms of the use cases and assessments
Collectively we need to work on the Shared Vision of ESC
Participate in the NASA ESDWG & ESC Reference Architecture
- what is the difference in the terms of the deliverable
- a difference between purely voluntary and semi voluntary
- merged the two together
- we’ve looked at a number of tools that are at least candidates
Jeff and Peter will be working together on Above
We’re treating the broad case, from beginning of scientific study to publication to education to user communities, there’s nothing that we’re treating as out of scope
What sort of by-in do we have for people using RAMADA?
Is the Science Definition Team Formed?
- this is a good opportunity for moving on with this process
Might be useful just to present a light what the ESC is to bring people in, to see if we can get some of the people in to work on this together
Grand Challenge “Killer App”
5 Year Plan
- Continue to define vision
- Put in reference architecture
- Once we have reference architecture, continue surveying tools to fill in spots of architecture (implementation, but will have to be tweaks)
- The vision will never completely stop
Siri Jodha:
- will align current funded “collaboratoy” – related projects with ESC activities. And vice-versa
- would change to “strategy” or “encourage” or “strategy”
Action Items
- Chris will add CEMAC items to wiki
- Champions should fill out chart
- For activities identify deliverables and outcomes we expect
- Send out individual emails to champions
