Difference between revisions of "Discovery Change Proposal-1"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
= DCP-1: ESIP Discovery Cast Atom Response Format v1.1 = | = DCP-1: ESIP Discovery Cast Atom Response Format v1.1 = | ||
| − | * '''Submitted on''': 2011-02-08T13:00 PST | + | * '''Progress''' |
| − | + | # '''Submitted on''': 2011-02-08T13:00 PST | |
| − | + | # '''Review period''': 2011-02-08T14:00 PST to 2011-03-01T00:00 PST | |
| − | * '''Facilitator''': Hook Hua (JPL) | + | # '''Revision''': |
| + | # '''Vote''': | ||
| + | # '''Final review''': | ||
| + | # '''Ratified''': | ||
| + | # '''Rejected''': | ||
| + | * '''Facilitator''': Hook Hua (JPL) | ||
== Description == | == Description == | ||
| − | At the NASA Earth Science Data System Working Group meeting in New Orleans on October 21, 2010, a proposal was made to expand the scope of Federated Open Search to cover Discovery more generally, thus bringing into the fold | + | At the NASA Earth Science Data System Working Group meeting in New Orleans on October 21, 2010, a proposal was made to expand the scope of Federated Open Search to cover Discovery more generally, thus bringing into the fold DataCasting and ServiceCasting. Therefore a common Atom response format is needed that extends the [http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4287.txt Atom Syndication Format (RFC 4287)] with extensions specific for Earth science data usage. This specification is the outcome of that working session. |
== Problem Addressed == | == Problem Addressed == | ||
| − | Currently OpenSearch, | + | Currently OpenSearch, DataCasting, and ServiceCasting all return very similar granule-level information. But there is no consistent format used. This proposal will provide a specification for a set of Earth science-specific extensions to the Atom response format. |
== Proposed Solution == | == Proposed Solution == | ||
| − | See [[Discovery Cast Atom Response Format v1.1]]. | + | See [[Discovery Cast Atom Response Format v1.1]]. Ideally, the response format should be useful across OpenSearch, DataCasting, and ServiceCasting responses. |
== Rationale for the Solution == | == Rationale for the Solution == | ||
| − | Reuse as much of existing standards as possible. Fold in Geo and Time extensions. Define a set of commonly used rel link types for OpenSearch, | + | Reuse as much of existing standards as possible. Fold in Geo and Time extensions. Define a set of commonly used rel link types for OpenSearch, DataCasting, and ServiceCasting. |
Revision as of 16:12, February 11, 2011
<< Back to the Discovery Change Proposals page
DCP-1: ESIP Discovery Cast Atom Response Format v1.1
- Progress
- Submitted on: 2011-02-08T13:00 PST
- Review period: 2011-02-08T14:00 PST to 2011-03-01T00:00 PST
- Revision:
- Vote:
- Final review:
- Ratified:
- Rejected:
- Facilitator: Hook Hua (JPL)
Description
At the NASA Earth Science Data System Working Group meeting in New Orleans on October 21, 2010, a proposal was made to expand the scope of Federated Open Search to cover Discovery more generally, thus bringing into the fold DataCasting and ServiceCasting. Therefore a common Atom response format is needed that extends the Atom Syndication Format (RFC 4287) with extensions specific for Earth science data usage. This specification is the outcome of that working session.
Problem Addressed
Currently OpenSearch, DataCasting, and ServiceCasting all return very similar granule-level information. But there is no consistent format used. This proposal will provide a specification for a set of Earth science-specific extensions to the Atom response format.
Proposed Solution
See Discovery Cast Atom Response Format v1.1. Ideally, the response format should be useful across OpenSearch, DataCasting, and ServiceCasting responses.
Rationale for the Solution
Reuse as much of existing standards as possible. Fold in Geo and Time extensions. Define a set of commonly used rel link types for OpenSearch, DataCasting, and ServiceCasting.
