Difference between revisions of "Discovering data"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''Discovery'''
 
'''Discovery'''
 +
(Note: this case is still being developed)
  
 
How to determine which dataset you want based on several similar looking collections
 
How to determine which dataset you want based on several similar looking collections

Latest revision as of 23:42, December 12, 2013

Discovery (Note: this case is still being developed)

How to determine which dataset you want based on several similar looking collections

  • distinguishing between different types of datasets
    • descriptions aren’t always helpful
    • crawling catalog links, automated harvesting
    • determining the popularity of the data for research
    • “yelp” for collections, “this data was useful” or “this data is crappy”
    • maybe use: http://schema.org/Review

Using DOIs for bidirectional links to research/publications and back to originating data

  • Interesting Questions:
    • What has this data been used for in research?
    • What data was used for this research, can I reproduce this work?
  • Dryad (http://wiki.datadryad.org/Main_Page):
    • it involves submitting actual data, not pointers to the data
  • Including DOI creation and citation as part of the process for data (not just publications)
    • how to enforce this?
    • incentives for data producers vs providers
    • feeds back into the rating system