Data Maturity Matrix

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Revision as of 13:41, March 10, 2015 by Ge.peng (talk | contribs) (→‎Q&As)

Purpose

This wiki page intends to collect the resources and information relevant to the evaluation and improvement of the Scientific Data Stewardship Maturity Matrix.


Meeting Notes


Publication

  • Peng, G., Privette, J. L., Kearns, E. J., Ritchey, N. A., & Ansari, S. (2015). A unified framework for measuring stewardship practices applied to digital environmental datasets. Data Science Journal, 13, 231-253. doi:10.2481/dsj.14-049


Resources

Q&As

Please submit additional questions via ESIP-Preserve list-serv.

  • What are those entities at the top of the matrix?

Those are entities under which “non-functional” requirements are asserted on scientific data stewardship. The terms non-functional and functional requirements are often used in systems engineering to define, in a broad sense, what a system is supposed to be and to do. The term “non-functional requirements” is used here to refer to constraints imposed by U.S federal regulations and agency policies on the stewardship of environmental data.

  • Does this maturity refer to that of an organization?

No. This maturity assessment model measures that of individual digital Earth Science datasets, leveraging community best practices and standards.

  • How does this stewardship maturity assessment model differ from the previous preservation maturity assessment models?

It distinguishes itself from most of the existing preservation maturity models in the following aspects: • It is dataset-oriented as opposed to process-oriented, providing a unified framework to assess the robustness of quantifiable stewardship practices that are applied to individual Earth Sciences datasets. • It stresses data quality and the scientific oversight in data and metadata quality and usability that are critical to climate environmental data products and their users and stakeholders.